[trans-mem] RFC Fix missing REG_TM notes

[Patrick Marlier]

On 01/09/2012 04:04 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 15:55 -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
>> On my side, I was able to fix the problem with genome but the patch is
>> not clean at all and I need to find exactly where and why the problem
>> was fixed.
>
> What do you mean?  Do you still see issues with Genome, even with the
> returns-twice patch?  If so, just on i686 or x86_64 too?  With libitm?
Sorry for confusion. Of course, I disabled your returns-twice patch. I 
patched at different places and I hope to figure out where is the 
problem and that it is not a side effect...
I am currently testing on x86_64 with libitm.

Patrick.