LTO multiple definition failures

[Andi Kleen]

> Anyway, the problem here isn't that I particularly care about coming up 
> with some workaround to make LTO work, but rather that tests from the 
> gcc testsuite are failing on this target because of what looks like 
> buggy LTO behavior instead of bugs in the target support, and I wanted 
> to be sure this was being tracked somewhere.  I didn't see a relevant 
> issue in either the gcc or binutils bugzillas, but if it's a known 
> consequence of the ld -r problem, I'll shut up and go away again.  ;-)

AFAIK none of the test suite tests the ld -r problem, at least not on x86-linux.
So it may be something else and still worth tracking down.

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.