weird optimization in sin+cos, x86 backend

Andrew Haley aph@redhat.com
Tue Feb 14 16:55:00 GMT 2012


On 02/14/2012 04:41 PM, Geert Bosch wrote:
> Right now we don't have a library either that conforms to C99

Are you sure?  As far as I know we do.  We might not meet
C99 Annex F, but that's not required.

> and meets the far more relaxed accuracy criteria of OpenCL and
> Ada.

Andrew.



More information about the Gcc mailing list