New atomics not mentioned in /gcc-4.7/changes.html

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 8 February 2012 13:06, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/08/2012 05:54 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely<jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Should they be?
>>
>> Yes.  Esp. also the deprecation of the __sync builtins.
>
> Yes, I meant to do that last week, but instead it's this week :-P     Gerald
> had pinged me about it a while ago.

Great, thanks - I was thinking about adding a line to the C++11
improvements in the libstdc++ section mentioning the new
implementation of <atomic>, do you think it's worth it?