Deprecate i386 for GCC 4.8?

Richard Biener richard.guenther@gmail.com
Thu Dec 13 11:02:00 GMT 2012


On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, John Marino <gnugcc@marino.st> wrote:
> On 12/13/2012 11:11, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>
>> They are stuck with pre-GPLv3 GCC compilers anyway.
>>
>> ISTR we changed the default i?86 triple from i386 to i586 for 4.6, so we
>> are already half-way through the deprecation.  I'd say simply go ahead.
>>
>> Note that i386-freebsd is still listed as primary architecture though, so
>> something has to be done about that first.  Steering Commitee please?
>> (I'd say drop *-freebsd from the list of primary/secondary archs entirely
>> given that they are not at all happy with GPLv3 and not using still
>> maintained
>> compilers)
>
>
>
> Both NetBSD and DragonFly BSD use GPLv3 compilers in their base systems.
> FreeBSD ports have every modern version of GCC in them, nothing stops a user
> from building and using the latest GCC on FreeBSD (Note the ports are well
> maintained).
>
> FreeBSD and DragonFly (at least) have already dropped i386 support, it's an
> alias for i486.  I don't know about NetBSD or OpenBSD.
>
> I don't speak for FreeBSD, but dropping them from Tier 1 support because
> they don't use a GPLv3 *BASE* compiler is a bit vindictive.

Well, I'm fine with changing it to i486-freebsd - just keeping i386-freebsd
listed but deprecating i386 looks odd.

Richard.

> John



More information about the Gcc mailing list