Question on INSN_P and "real" insns

[Georg-Johann Lay]

Eric Botcazou schrieb:
>> From my understanding a "real" insn is an insn that leads to code that will
>> be executed like INSN, CALL_INSN or JUMP_INSN but not DEBUG_INSN that's
>> used for location tracking or shipping debug information or CODE_LABEL or
>> whatever.
>>
>> This means that next_real_insn depends on -g? And that I have to write my
>> own next really_real_insn?
> 
> Try prev_active_insn/next_active_insn.

Ahh, yes. That looks fine. :-) Thanks Eric