Bugzilla components for target libraries
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Fri Nov 11 06:04:00 GMT 2011
Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:
> The entries in parens are only covered indirectly and may or may not
> warrant their own components. I'd argue that it would be helpful to
> have libada and libgo components of their own (while libcpp would
> probably be overkill), but of course that's ultimately up to the
> respective maintainers.
I see no advantage to a separate libgo component. Bug reports won't
know which component to use when filing a bug. The maintainers of the
go/libgo components would be the same.
> I'm undeciced what to do about libdecnumber (primarily/exclusively from
> upstream), libiberty (shared with src), and libssp (probably too
> small/too little activity to warrant its own component).
libiberty should just be other.
Ian
More information about the Gcc
mailing list