AspectG++ ?

[Joel Sherrill]

On 02/18/2011 02:46 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 18 February 2011 20:26, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
>> I'm NO compiler architect, but from my point of perspective - please correct
>> me if I'm wrong - for adding support for AOP into C/C++ part of gcc, only minor
>> changes would be needed.
> Even if that's true (I don't know, but adding almost anything to g++
> is difficult) the point is not "can it be done" but whether someone
> would be willing to maintain and support the changes.  If not, the
> code will rot and stop working and eventually have to be removed.
And non-standard extensions are generally
not acceptable.

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985