sparc-rtems recent test regressions

[Joel Sherrill]

On 02/07/2011 01:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In the past few days, something has regressed
>>>>> on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
>>>>> and ~100 of those were LTO related.  David Korn's
>>>>> patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504
>>>>> has 2231 failures.
>> Were you able to test whether or not the ira-costs.c patch was the cause
>> of these problems?  It's been problematical elsewhere and it wouldn't
>> take much more than a nudge to for me to pull it given its ability to
>> uncover latent problems.
>>
>>> This is for revision 169231.  So it looks like that caused
>>> the failures.
> OK.  I'm going to take a looksie.  As long as it isn't something I've
> already fixed or some dumb bug elsewhere, the plan is to pull the
> ira-costs patch and revisit it in stage1.
>
If you need me to test something, just yell.

--joel
> jeff
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNUEv/AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7WPQH+QGJOYGd3xLGqj0tx7ObT2GZ
> 7xvwUc8xHdKhnp/ltLyl2mb4SUmnhD0OQ5UXEQPD6jtDJmS3Xh2RO/LnmD0vo9Nb
> TwvPvgq4ilR67hY2SvDAaHqHnclV4BAfVjhIKdRM3AZxO+a+ufTGJtTm7VZ8AiHO
> 531EDvrr7KCKTZRQqj2zqZWo/bO/Z1RjbX0BNV0B641OwP5Ng5md1XnGaNSPI3wq
> 4oSLfhFcm4YFYlxOqrmtJkHZHHOADNmpRHIRUbg/qC8quLr48v56wk4Bmn60x3/B
> w0ldVZJqGg5Y0tyvpAdgYAzsNI7cQledwRJyLC1wiQWs2JzIztaGN6VkIWxo/HU=
> =iM9P
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985