sparc-rtems recent test regressions

[Joel Sherrill]

On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the past few days, something has regressed
>> on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures
>> and ~100 of those were LTO related.  David Korn's
>> patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504
>> has 2231 failures.
> Were you able to test whether or not the ira-costs.c patch was the cause
> of these problems?  It's been problematical elsewhere and it wouldn't
> take much more than a nudge to for me to pull it given its ability to
> uncover latent problems.

This is for revision 169231.  So it looks like that caused
the failures.

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            67735
# of unexpected failures        635
# of expected failures          227
# of unresolved testcases       50
# of unsupported tests          1233

> jeff
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNUBBwAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7A38H/0xhcKeVjAZm1R2XL/t0W99K
> U21D+Rn+Un0NeO0KaVr8SrpZZ2Nfyfrt62TqvyCjK6UuvBPlu8NNK1C7GBcR1gZQ
> yZHVt99hyYChpBosFnRm/kef0736E9CNLzd1IQBWXTv9X0RJPyR8NdIUEnYNG9st
> hj2+xHDOUR4JFdWxaObZlzFcJkQOSfd1m0oe5uUHaCLG2XDhwvVGj6z7tBL22+XC
> J00oDcMPV/5Hm4xGv8rJ+rOezS7wvn1ifjAfy2NkhKqH5nR+wr6Z4l0o2VYb04kv
> LU8eNo5Z4bVSXHNXH/LPUXaBRbYxU1KyBp8Fx+oEyrh6P8PuaTb4IHK5Xi4MOlY=
> =sQGQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research&  Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
    Support Available             (256) 722-9985