Bumping DATESTAMP (was: GCC 4.3.5 Status Report (2010-05-22))
Richard Guenther
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Wed Feb 2 13:32:00 GMT 2011
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> >> The DATESTAMP change could also be in a post-commit hook (doing
>> >> nothing if the date didn't change, of course). No idea whether
>> >> this is technically possible of course.
>> > Yes, the post-commit hook can do this task.
>> > If we really want to do that, I can update the current post-commit
>> > hook script [1].
>>
>> I'd love to see that and will be happy to work on this with you,
>> apply a patch, etc.
>>
>> Let's give others the chance to chime in, and if there are no
>> objections within the next two days, let's proceed. Fair?
>
> I'd say it should go into a pre-commit hook instead of
> post-commit, if possible. So that when one checks in some particular
> revision DATESTAMP already has the right timestamp.
I wonder if it can go into the same commit even?
Richard.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list