Question about SMS scheduling windows

[Richard Sandiford]

Ayal Zaks <ayal.zaks@gmail.com> writes:
>> (FWIW, libav did show up extra differences when using the patch
>> that I'd originally submitted.  They were due to the count_preds
>> and count_succs thing that you picked up in your review.)
>
>
> (These differences had no noticable consequences performance-wise, right?)

Well, because they were unintentional, I'm afraid I didn't measure them.
The committed version didn't have these differences.  (It was an assembly
source comparison, so I don't have a ready way of measuring the performance
of each affected loop.)

Richard