intmax_t vs (extended) integer types
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Sep 14 15:37:00 GMT 2010
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> long long, by specifying that <cinttypes> adds overloads for intmax_t
> only when the latter is an actual extended integer type, thus does not
> boil down to any standard integer type.
>
> I'm looking for help in figuring out whether this situation can really
> happen with GCC on the supported targets, in particular in relationship
> to the work on inttypes.h. Certainly doesn't happen on Linux, where it's
> just long long, as far as I can see...
INTMAX_TYPE is not currently defined for any target to use an extended
integer type.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list