CUMULATIVE_ARGS in hooks (Was: RFC: semi-automatic hookization)
Joern Rennecke
amylaar@spamcop.net
Wed Nov 17 14:34:00 GMT 2010
Quoting Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>:
> I am admittedly a C++ newbie; the first thing I thought of was:
>
> class gcc::cumulative_args {
> virtual void advance (...) = 0;
> virtual rtx arg (...) = 0;
> virtual rtx incoming_arg (...) { return this->arg (...); };
> virtual int arg_partial_bytes (...) = 0;
> // ...and so on for many of the hooks that take CUMULATIVE_ARGS *
> // possibly with default implementations instead of pure virtual
> // functions.
> };
Trying to put a target-derived object of that into struct rtl_data would
be nonsentical. You might store a pointer, of course.
But at any rate, the member function implementations would not be part
of the globally-visible target vector. They are in a smaller vector, and
only the pieces of the middle end that deal with argument passing get to
see them.
Does that mean you acknowledge that we shouldn't have CUMULATIVE_ARGS
taking hooks in the global target vector?
More information about the Gcc
mailing list