Mailing lists for back-end development?
Diego Novillo
dnovillo@google.com
Tue Nov 16 21:02:00 GMT 2010
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:57, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> I think that splitting things all the way down to $arch is probably
> not useful in that things that affect all backends will not get
> addressed promptly if backend reviewers are so narrowly focused.
Agreed. A backend specific list may work, but I don't think it would
be useful to make it too specific. I'm not too sanguine about the
whole idea, though.
Perhaps encourage the use of [prefix] tags like we do for branches and
large modules? I would rather use tagging than a fixed taxonomy.
It's more flexible and easier to change if our needs change.
Diego.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list