non-algorithmic maintainers
Zdenek Dvorak
rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz
Mon Nov 15 22:59:00 GMT 2010
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
> > We currently have 3 non-algorithmic maintainers:
> >
> > loop optimizer      Zdenek Dvorak      ook@ucw.cz
> > loop optimizer      Daniel Berlin      dberlin@dberlin.org
> > libcpp          Tom Tromey        tromey@redhat.com
> >
> > Especially for the loop optimizer, the situation is a bit strange. There are
> > no other maintainers for this specific area (only middle-end/GIMPLE/RTL
> > maintainers); Daniel has never really been active in this area (except for
> > the old lambda code and scev which has separate maintainers); Zdenek, while
> > not very active lately, has basically written the loop optimizer and has
> > always been helpful with reviews.
> >
> > I don't think there is a particular reason to keep this category, whose
> > boundaries have actually never been very clear.
>
> I thought that all non-algorithmic maintainers were demoted to reviewers
> automagically. It would be indeed nice to get rid of the strange
> category.
>
> Consider demoting yourself voluntarily (by applying a patch moving
> yourself to the reviewers section).
done; I am not likely to use the non-algorithmic maintainer privileges (whatever
they actualy used to be) anytime soon, anyway (unfortunately),
Zdenek
More information about the Gcc
mailing list