gcc 4.5.1 / as 2.20.51.0.11 miscompiling drivers/char/i8k.c ?

Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Mon Nov 15 17:06:00 GMT 2010


On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see any problems on the assembly level.  i8k_smm is
> not inlined in this case and checks all 3 conditions.

If it really is related to gcc not understanding that "*regs" has
changed due to the memory being an automatic variable, and passing in
"regs" itself as a pointer to that automatic variable together with
the "memory" clobber not being sufficient, than I think it's the lack
of inlining that will automatically hide the bug.

(Side note: and I think this does show how much of a gcc bug it is not
to consider "memory" together with passing in a pointer to an asm to
always be a clobber).

Because if it isn't inlined, then "regs" will be seen a a real pointer
to some external memory (the caller) rather than being optimized to
just be the auto structure on the stack. Because *mem is auto only
within the context of the caller.

Which actually points to a possible simpler:
 - remove the "+m" since it adds too much register pressure
 - mark the i8k_smm() as "noinline" instead.

Quite frankly, I'd hate to add even more crud to that inline asm (to
save/restore the registers manually). It's already not the prettiest
thing around.

So does the attached patch work for everybody?

                             Linus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: patch.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1019 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20101115/d3b20e56/attachment.bin>


More information about the Gcc mailing list