Using C++ in GCC is OK

Steven Bosscher
Mon May 31 15:15:00 GMT 2010

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Richard Guenther
<> wrote:
> And we definitely should not do so just because we can.  I see
> little value in turning our tree upside-down just because we now
> can use C++ and make everything a class rather than a union.

If hiding the structure of the data types matters, then 'tree' should
be re-done as a class, shouldn't it? Otherwise, how are you going to
get rid of all the accessor macros and static inline functions that
only half-hide the underlying structures?


More information about the Gcc mailing list