[RFC] Implementing addressof for C++0x
Peter Dimov
pdimov@pdimov.com
Thu May 20 12:19:00 GMT 2010
> On 05/20/2010 01:55 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> It's uglier because the code above doesn't work for functions,
>>
> By the way, do you have a specific testcase in mind?
>
> Because addressof_fn_test.cpp, part of Boost, passes...
This is probably a g++/gcc extension... some compilers do not allow
references to functions to be casted to char&, and I believe the standard
doesn't permit that, either.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list