role of executable_checksum & LTO?

[Diego Novillo]

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:35, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:

> I agree, but a plugin could also do likewise, e.g. write memory contents
> in some kind of persistent storage.

Why don't we cross that bridge when we get to it?  It seems odd to me
that a plugin would want to wind itself very tightly around a specific
lto1 binary.  I am not seeing an advantage to that kind of
requirement.

In fact, I'd love to have a PCH implementation that does not need to
tie itself to a specific binary.


Diego.