Accessor macros for target-specific types / enum reg_class -> int changes

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Joern Rennecke <amylaar@spamcop.net> writes:

> Would patches to introduce these accessor macros be considered separately,
> or should I only submit them as part of the big patch for PR44566?

> Would patches for this be considered separately?

I would always prefer to see smaller patches.  I can't imagine any
case when I would prefer to see a big patch if there were any possible
way to break it up into independent pieces.

Ian