Using C++ in GCC is OK

[Toon Moene]

On 06/03/2010 12:51 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:

> Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> Indeed. It is, well, perhaps not surprising, but quite annoying (to me
>> at least) that a possible move to C++ as implementation language of
>> GCC is so much bigger news than all the amazing amounts of work done
>> in the last few years on things like LTO, the vectorizer, IRA, etc...
>
> And indeed you have to worry a bit that productive work on critical
> areas like this may be siphoned off developing, reviewing and testing
> changes from C to C++ whose benefit may often be much less than the
> work involved in doing them.

I know someone who works at a National Lab in the US (that will not be 
named) who had his management decide to rewrite a rather crucial (to 
that Lab's core business) 6+ million line Fortran system into C++.

He told me that 11 years ago.  When I met him again in February, I 
related to him that I referred to that project as "the one with its 
return on investment date firmly in the 22nd century" to *my* management.

He replied that his management currently doesn't believe it will have a 
return on investment at all - they've written it off as a valuable 
"learning experience".

-- 
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html#Fortran