GFDL/GPL issues

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

> I believe that the only real fix here is (a) for the FSF to abandon the
> GFDL, and relicense manuals under the GPL, or (b) for the FSF to add an
> exception to the GFDL, making it compatible with the GPL in some way.
> However, I have no evidence that the FSF is considering either of these
> ideas; RMS didn't provide encouraging feedback when I made such suggestions.

What if we ask the FSF if we can dual license the constraints.md files
under both the GPL and the GFDL?

Ian