Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI

[Andrew Stubbs]

On 12/07/10 14:25, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> This means that we need to choose a name for it. Obviously, it's better
> if it's an "official" name, so I want to discuss it here. I'm aware that
> there is some bikeshedding to do here, but it's better it gets done
> before anybody gets stuck with something else. There are, of course,
> some real practical reasons why one name might be better than another.

So, it seems this issue is not as simple as I thought. :(

Opinion seem to be somewhat divided, but in the absence of any sort of 
consensus, I suppose I'll have to propose that the various projects use 
the vendor field.

The alternative would be to add a configure test that checked the 
defaults in the existing host compiler, and duplicated the defaults 
somehow, but that sounds somewhat icky.

Andrew