Crucial C++ inlining broken under -Os

Frank Ch. Eigler fche@redhat.com
Fri Jul 2 14:06:00 GMT 2010


Joern Rennecke <amylaar@spamcop.net> writes:

> [...]  But if the function is very simple, the only reason to keep
> it would be if its address was taken somewhere, or if we tailcall
> it.

... or to make it available from gdb as an inferior call.

- FChE



More information about the Gcc mailing list