Patch pinging
Paolo Bonzini
bonzini@gnu.org
Thu Jul 1 10:44:00 GMT 2010
On 06/30/2010 09:43 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:24 PM, David Edelsohn<dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> He understood your point very well. That is why Frank said, "You
>> falsely presume zero vetting."
>
> Maybe I didn't get the zero vetting part, then. I thought I did, but
> apparently not. What does that mean in this context? Google isn't
> telling me.
It means that if you had said "John Doe" or "Jane Smith" Frank would
have likely rejected your name as well.
Of course you could have given a plausible name or even a fake name that
he would not recognize (e.g. in Italy "Mario Rossi" is frequently used
this way), but at some point you have to trust the other person's good
faith.
I don't know if anyone is using fake names in the FSF copyright list. I
think the FSF would be *very* upset if that was the case, and might go
as far as vetting the contributions of the user and removing them. If
someone used a fake name when explicitly asked for a real name, why
should I trust him to not violate copyright?
Paolo
More information about the Gcc
mailing list