LTO question

[Manuel López-Ibáñez]

>> > Not yet, I mistakenly thought -fwhole-program is the same as -fwhopr
>> > and it is just for solving scaling issue of large program.(These two
>> > options do look similar :-). I shall try next.
>>
>> Yep, -fwhopr is not ideal name, but I guess there is not much
>> to do about it.

It is marked as experimental, so if it is going to stay for GCC 4.6,
then we should change the name. I think one possibility discussed
somewhere is that LTO scales back automatically, so the option would
be not necessary.

Cheers,

Manuel.