[PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice

[Richard Guenther]

On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > As commented to my last status report develop.html does not reflect
> > reality anymore.  The following tries to adjust it carefully in
> > this respect.
> 
> I believe you got the math wrong in one case, when you went from
> four months that a branch will need to be maintained in the old
> model up to six months.  Is it possible you ment to substract the
> two months Stage 2 used to take instead of add it?

Indeed, I mixed in the length of stage1.  Four month would be
still about correct (2 month stage3 plus 2 month before we branch,
in the old model it was 2 month stage2 plus 2 month stage3).

> Since it seems hard to predicat the time between the end of Stage 3
> and branching, I suggest to just say "a few months".
>
> The patch below does that in its last hunk and makes one or the
> other editorial change.
> 
> Thoughts?

Ok with me.

Thanks,
Richard.