Cannot get Bit test RTL to cooperate with Combine.
Andrew Hutchinson
andrewhutchinson@cox.net
Tue Sep 22 01:20:00 GMT 2009
Thank you so much for your information!
I will investigate your patch.
(I just hacked lowpart_for_combine to allow lowering something larger
than word and the subreg matched no problem.)
It looks like RTL generation is somewhat odd and not helping.
My test used
extern long x;
if (x & 1)....
If there is only a single reference to x then (x &1), is lowered to HI
mode and does not included any subregs (nosplit-wide-types). So my
patterns match.
If my test code included two bit tests - I get HI mode subregs on the x
&1 (which will not match) but not on x & 2 the latter is in the wider
SI mode and will match.
If I turn on split-wide-types, the subregs are not removed by subreg
lowering since there is now mixed mode usage!
Something seem backwards in expansion, regarding lowering and references.
Andy
Joern Rennecke wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:49:39PM -0400, Andrew Hutchinson wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I have been debugging AVR port to see why we fail to match so many bit
>> test opportunities.
>>
>> When dealing with longer modes I have come across a problem I can not
>> solve.
>>
>> Expansion in RTL for a bit test can produce two styles.
>>
>> STYLE 1 Bit to be tested is NOT LSB (e.g. if ( longthing & 0x10)), the
>> expanded code contains the test as:
>>
>> (and:SI (reg:SI 45 [ lx.1 ])
>> (const_int 16 [0x10]))
>>
>> Bit tests are matched by combine. Combine has no problems with this and
>> eventually creates a matching pattern based on the conversion of the AND
>> to a zero extraction
>>
>> (set (pc)
>> (if_then_else (ne (zero_extract:SI (subreg:QI (reg:SI 45 [ lx.1 ]) 0)
>> (const_int 1 [0x1])
>> (const_int 4 [0x4]))
>> (const_int 0 [0x0]))
>> (label_ref:HI 133)
>> (pc)))
>>
>> This will match Bit test patterns and produces optimal code. :-)
>
> Unfortunately, when combine knows about upper bits that are zero, it
> will generate an lshiftrt instead, which can't be legitimately matched
> by a bit test.
>
> I have a patch for this which I haven't gotten around yet to test it
> separately in trunk and formally submit to the patches list, but you can
> extract it from arc-20081210-branch:
>
> 2008-12-02 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@arc.com>
>
> * combine.c (undo_since): New function, broken out of:
> (undo_all).
> (combine_simplify_bittest): New function.
> (combine_simplify_rtx, simplify_if_then_else): Use it.
> * config/arc/arc.c (arc_rtx_costs): Check for bbit test.
>
> svn diff -r144651:144652
> svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/arc-20081210-branch/gcc/combine.c
>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list