Bitfields
Paolo Bonzini
bonzini@gnu.org
Sun Sep 20 14:01:00 GMT 2009
> reg.field1 = val1, reg.field2 = val2;
>
> would then turn into fetch, mask with a combined mask of field1 and
> field2, or val1, or val2, store.
You can also do the RMW yourself: declare the register volatile, but not
the fields of it, and copy in/out of the register manually.
volatile struct reg x;
...
{
struct reg mine = x;
mine.field1 = true;
mine.field2 = 0;
mine.field3++;
x = mine;
}
> Is it a completely brain-dead idea?
If I understood it correctly, it would not be standard compliant.
Paolo
More information about the Gcc
mailing list