i370 port
Paul Edwards
mutazilah@gmail.com
Sat Sep 19 12:57:00 GMT 2009
>> C:\devel\gccnew\gcc>gccmvs -DUSE_MEMMGR -Os -S -ansi -pedantic-errors -DHAVE_CON
>> FIG_H -DIN_GCC -DPUREISO -I ../../pdos/pdpclib -I . -I config/i370 -I
>> ../include
>> varasm.c
>> (insn 117 429 118 7 (parallel [
>> (set (reg:SI 64)
>> (compare:SI (mem/s:BLK (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 21
>> virtual-stack-vars)
>>
>> (const_int 456 [0x1c8])) [232 value+0 S196
>> A64])
>> (mem:BLK (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 61 [ desc ])
>> (const_int 8 [0x8])) [0 A8])))
>> (use (const_int 196 [0xc4]))
>> ]) -1 (nil)
>> (nil))
>> varasm.c: In function `force_const_mem':
>> varasm.c:3021: internal compiler error: in
>> instantiate_virtual_regs_lossage,
>> at function.c:3767
>
> OK, so what goes on here is that GCC attempts to replace the "virtual"
> register 21 (virtual-stack-vars) with some real register, that is
> frame pointer + STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET. It seems for the i370 port,
> this should resolve to
> register 13 + STACK_POINTER_OFFSET + current_function_outgoing_args_size
>
> Overall, the middle-end would therefore replace "reg 21 + 456" with
> "reg 13 + X", where X is constant computed from 456 + STACK_POINTER_OFFSET
> + current_function_outgoing_args_size.
>
> It will then re-process the insn pattern constraints to verify that the
> resulting insn is still valid. At this stage, it appears we're running
> into the above error. I'm not quite sure why this would be case, this
> will require some further debugging why the insn was not recognized ...
Ok, I spent today trying to solve this problem. Although I didn't succeed
in solving it properly, I did at least find a workaround for the one
instance.
I found that in the failing circumstance, neither of the two things being
compared fell into the "force copy" situation. I don't know whether that
is right or wrong, but at least I can detect whether a "force copy" was
done. If no force copy was done, I stop doing the short CLC and let
it do the CLCL instead. See below where I have introduced the "copy"
variable. Unfortunately it affects other things, ie good CLCs have been
converted into CLCL also, which is a shame. However, it may at least
mean the compiler doesn't have a bug as far as the end user is
concerned, ie it generates valid code.
I have a theory that if both displacements in the S-type (ie register plus
displacement) address are non-zero, that something fails. So the
next thing I will do is see if I can detect just that situation, and stop
it going into the CLC.
Some of these md constructs are beginning to make more sense. :-)
BFN. Paul.
;
; cmpmemsi instruction pattern(s).
;
(define_expand "cmpmemsi"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "general_operand" "")
(compare (match_operand:BLK 1 "general_operand" "")
(match_operand:BLK 2 "general_operand" "")))
(use (match_operand:SI 3 "general_operand" ""))
(use (match_operand:SI 4 "" ""))]
""
"
{
rtx op1, op2;
int copy = 0;
op1 = XEXP (operands[1], 0);
if (GET_CODE (op1) == REG
|| (GET_CODE (op1) == PLUS && GET_CODE (XEXP (op1, 0)) == REG
&& GET_CODE (XEXP (op1, 1)) == CONST_INT
&& (unsigned) INTVAL (XEXP (op1, 1)) < 4096))
{
op1 = operands[1];
}
else
{
op1 = gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, copy_to_mode_reg (SImode, op1));
copy = 1;
}
op2 = XEXP (operands[2], 0);
if (GET_CODE (op2) == REG
|| (GET_CODE (op2) == PLUS && GET_CODE (XEXP (op2, 0)) == REG
&& GET_CODE (XEXP (op2, 1)) == CONST_INT
&& (unsigned) INTVAL (XEXP (op2, 1)) < 4096))
{
op2 = operands[2];
}
else
{
op2 = gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, copy_to_mode_reg (SImode, op2));
copy = 1;
}
/* so long as at least one operand was copied, this seems safe */
if (copy &&
GET_CODE (operands[3]) == CONST_INT && INTVAL (operands[3]) < 256)
{
emit_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, gen_rtvec (2,
gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, operands[0],
gen_rtx_COMPARE (SImode, op1, op2)), /* was VOIDmode */
gen_rtx_USE (VOIDmode, operands[3]))));
}
else
{
/* implementation suggested by Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com>
*/
rtx reg1 = gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
rtx reg2 = gen_reg_rtx (DImode);
rtx result = operands[0];
rtx mem1 = operands[1];
rtx mem2 = operands[2];
rtx len = operands[3];
if (!CONSTANT_P (len))
len = force_reg (SImode, len);
/* Load up the address+length pairs. */
emit_insn (gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, reg1));
emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_SUBREG (SImode, reg1, 0),
force_operand (XEXP (mem1, 0), NULL_RTX));
emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_SUBREG (SImode, reg1, GET_MODE_SIZE
(SImode)), len);
emit_insn (gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, reg2));
emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_SUBREG (SImode, reg2, 0),
force_operand (XEXP (mem2, 0), NULL_RTX));
emit_move_insn (gen_rtx_SUBREG (SImode, reg2, GET_MODE_SIZE
(SImode)), len);
/* Compare! */
emit_insn (gen_cmpmemsi_1 (result, reg1, reg2));
}
DONE;
}")
; Compare a block that is less than 256 bytes in length.
(define_insn ""
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=d")
(compare:SI (match_operand:BLK 1 "s_operand" "m")
(match_operand:BLK 2 "s_operand" "m")))
(use (match_operand:QI 3 "immediate_operand" "I"))]
"((unsigned) INTVAL (operands[3]) < 256)"
"*
{
check_label_emit ();
mvs_check_page (0, 22, 0);
return \"CLC %O1(%c3,%R1),%2\;BH *+12\;BL *+6\;SLR %0,%0\;LNR %0,%0\";
}"
[(set_attr "length" "22")]
)
; Compare a block that is larger than 255 bytes in length.
; (mem:BLK (subreg:SI (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "+d")
0))
; (mem:BLK (subreg:SI (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "+d")
0))))
(define_insn "cmpmemsi_1"
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "+d")
(compare:SI
(mem:BLK (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "+d") )
(mem:BLK (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "+d") )))
(use (match_dup 1))
(use (match_dup 2))
(clobber (match_dup 1))
(clobber (match_dup 2))]
""
"*
{
check_label_emit ();
mvs_check_page (0, 18, 0);
return \"LA %0,1(0,0)\;CLCL %1,%2\;BH *+12\;BL *+6\;SLR %0,%0\;LNR
%0,%0\";
}"
[(set_attr "length" "18")]
)
More information about the Gcc
mailing list