Replacing certain operations with function calls
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Wed Sep 2 15:34:00 GMT 2009
On 09/01/2009 03:20 PM, Jean Christophe Beyler wrote:
> First off: does this seem correct?
Yes. Though I do wonder why you are avoiding using the normal libcall
machinery. If all you really care about is changing the function name,
then all you need to do is modify the appropriate optab. See, for
instance, arm_init_libfuncs.
But if you need slightly different calling conventions, then this will
work just fine. Compare this to the Alpha TFmode routines generated by
alpha_emit_xfloating_libcall.
> However, I am unsure this is possible in the expand stage, would the
> expand stage automatically have this instead:
>
> mult tmp1, a, b
> mult tmp2, c, d
>
> mov output1, tmp1
> mov output2, tmp2
> call bar
Yes, this is exactly what expand_call does.
r~
More information about the Gcc
mailing list