delete dead feature branches?

[Daniel Berlin]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/12/2009 05:17 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>
>> That seems like a huge bug in git-svn because we already use multiple
>> directory levels under branches.  Hint ibm and redhat and debain.
>
> Yep, that's why I said "expand".  I've thought about fixing that aspect of
> git-svn, but I'm not sure how it would tell the difference between a branch
> directory and a directory of branches given that SVN basically models a
> filesystem.
>

Branches always start with a copy of a directory somewhere else, at
least in the gcc repo.
Further, at least in the gcc repo, all branches start with a copy of a
directory from branches or from trunk.
So, it's fairly easy to detect branches.

> Jason
>