delete dead feature branches?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/12/2009 10:22 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> Yep. Anyone deleting dead branches should add a link to the last "live"
>> version in branches.html. It seems easier to me to move them under
>> branches/dead, and possibly create branches/merged.
>
> Multiple directory levels under branches/ confuse git-svn; it thinks "dead"
> is a single branch.  I'd rather not expand on that usage.

That seems like a huge bug in git-svn because we already use multiple
directory levels under branches.  Hint ibm and redhat and debain.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski