BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions
H. Peter Anvin
hpa@zytor.com
Thu Nov 19 21:16:00 GMT 2009
Hence a new unconstrained option...
"Jeff Law" <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>On 11/19/09 12:50, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>
>> Calling the profiler immediately at the entry point is clearly the more
>> sane option. It means the ABI is well-defined, stable, and independent
>> of what the actual function contents are. It means that ABI isn't the
>> normal C ABI (the __fentry__ function would have to preserve all
>> registers), but that's fine...
>>
>Note there are targets (even some old x86 variants) that required the
>profiling calls to occur after the prologue. Unfortunately, nobody
>documented *why* that was the case. Sigh.
>
>Jeff
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse any lack of formatting.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list