RFC: Option handling and PR 37565
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Fri May 29 18:00:00 GMT 2009
Steve Ellcey <sje@cup.hp.com> writes:
> So instead of
> if (flag_var_tracking)
> we would have
> if (targetm.get_optimization_flag_value(OPT_fvar_tracking))
I don't particularly want to have to make an indirect function call
every time we check a flag. I don't see why we should check every time
when we can determine the value once when the compiler starts.
Also, we would still need a place to give backend warnings like
unwind tables currently require either a frame pointer or -maccumulate-outgoing-args for correctness
So I guess I don't much like the idea.
Ian
More information about the Gcc
mailing list