Problems with in-tree host libraries (gmp, ppl, etc)

[Paolo Bonzini]

>> No, it was not.  So you can drop in gmp/mpfr, or ppl/cloog, but not all
>> four.
>
> I would like to again suggest that we declare in-tree builds of this
> stuff out of scope.

For ppl/cloog which are not mandatory I agree.  I think in-tree
GMP/MPFR however is especially useful for people who build on
non-GNU/Linux systems, where packaging of free software libraries is
not as well developed as RPM/DEB/ports.

Paolo