CGEN-generated files vs GPL
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Wed Jan 28 22:08:00 GMT 2009
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, DJ Delorie wrote:
> What are the implications (GPL-wise) of using CGEN-generated files in
> gcc? Specifically, I'm working on a second attempt to contribute the
> MeP port, and its intrinsics are CGEN-generated (and there are a *lot*
> of them - most opcodes have an intrinsic). I'd rather not have to
> manually enter all that info twice (there are VLIW tags, latency info,
> etc - for each intrinsic)
I believe the source code (i.e., what you'd change to modify the
intrinsics) needs including in the GCC release tarballs. I don't think
CGEN itself needs including, any more than OCaml needs including because
the ARM NEON intrinsic generators are written in OCaml.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc
mailing list