Definitely not IRA [was Re: Probably not IRA [was Re: IRA vs. frame pointer elimination [PR38952]]]

[Dave Korn]

Dave Korn wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>
>    [ ... snip ... ]
>
>   Sorry, the conclusion of that post evolved a bit while I was writing it,
> but I forgot to update the subject.  This is what I should have posted it as.
>  I'll start a fresh thread when I know more about the cause of the failure.

  So, I started a fresh thread  :-)

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg01258.html

    cheers,
      DaveK