libmudflap and emutls question

Frank Ch. Eigler fche@redhat.com
Mon Jan 5 18:11:00 GMT 2009


On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:12:08AM +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:

> >[...]  Other alternatives would include having
> >emutls define something in addition to HAVE_TLS that activates the
> >!HAVE_TLS implementation in libmudflap/mf-hooks3.c.
>
> Thanks for your help! How about the attached patch, which follows your 
> advice?

That makes sense to me, but I'd appreciate others' advice too (rth?).

- FChE



More information about the Gcc mailing list