libmudflap and emutls question
Frank Ch. Eigler
fche@redhat.com
Mon Jan 5 18:11:00 GMT 2009
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:12:08AM +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
> >[...] Other alternatives would include having
> >emutls define something in addition to HAVE_TLS that activates the
> >!HAVE_TLS implementation in libmudflap/mf-hooks3.c.
>
> Thanks for your help! How about the attached patch, which follows your
> advice?
That makes sense to me, but I'd appreciate others' advice too (rth?).
- FChE
More information about the Gcc
mailing list