Defining a common plugin machinery

Sat Sep 20 03:41:00 GMT 2008

Taras wrote:
> However, I do think it's awesome to be able to store plugin results in 
> the resulting binary to do LTO-style analyses. How well is that working 
> for you?

I would be delighted if that would be easily possible, but I remember 
having asked at some LTO related session or meeting if LTO can be 
extended to add some additional data, and the answer was "we don't want 
to do that".

email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***

More information about the Gcc mailing list