Defining a common plugin machinery
Basile STARYNKEVITCH
basile@starynkevitch.net
Sat Sep 20 03:41:00 GMT 2008
Taras wrote:
> However, I do think it's awesome to be able to store plugin results in
> the resulting binary to do LTO-style analyses. How well is that working
> for you?
I would be delighted if that would be easily possible, but I remember
having asked at some LTO related session or meeting if LTO can be
extended to add some additional data, and the answer was "we don't want
to do that".
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***
More information about the Gcc
mailing list