Defining a common plugin machinery

Basile STARYNKEVITCH basile@starynkevitch.net
Sat Sep 20 03:41:00 GMT 2008


Taras wrote:
> However, I do think it's awesome to be able to store plugin results in 
> the resulting binary to do LTO-style analyses. How well is that working 
> for you?

I would be delighted if that would be easily possible, but I remember 
having asked at some LTO related session or meeting if LTO can be 
extended to add some additional data, and the answer was "we don't want 
to do that".



-- 
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***



More information about the Gcc mailing list