extra instructions lost from -O0 to -O1
Thomas A.M. Bernard
t.bernard@uva.nl
Thu Sep 11 14:28:00 GMT 2008
Steven,
In the MD file, I have this pattern:
(define_insn "setallocate"
[(setallocate (match_operand:DI 0 "general_operand" "r")
)]
""
"allocate %0\t\t#TCB_INSTRUCTIONS"
[(set_attr "type" "multi")])
As you said dce takes out the instruction when flag -01 is engaged. I
would like to reformat the pattern with the proper side-effects to
ensure that the instruction will stay whatever flag is used. Any clue in
this example ? I have tried unspec_volatile without success though. As
follow,
(define_insn "setallocate"
[(setallocate
(unspec_volatile:DI [ (match_operand:DI 0 "general_operand"
"r")]
UNSPEC_ALLOCATE)
)]
""
"allocate %0\t\t#TCB_INSTRUCTIONS"
[(set_attr "type" "multi")])
Thanks for any help.
Thomas
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Thomas A.M. Bernard <t.bernard@uva.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I inserted some extra instructions in the Alpha back-end (MD files). They
>> are properly emitted when the flag -O0 is enabled. Since they have no side
>> effects and no dependencies on other instructions, they are omitted when
>> flag -O1 is engaged. Is there a way (I mean attribute/constraint in their MD
>> patterns) to avoid that and keep the extra instructions in any case ?
>>
>
> Depends on how you modeled your instructions. You could use
> unspec_volatile, but if you modeled "normal" instructions, you have to
> somehow make the side-effects of your instructions clear. Otherwise,
> dead code elimination will just remove the instructions (no
> dependencies -> dead).
>
> But you'd have to show what you're doing and what you're trying to
> achieve, exactly, for a more helpful answer ;-)
>
> Gr.
> Steven
>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list