more m32c brokenness

[Richard Guenther]

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:15 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> The patch simply enabled type checking by default.  As I don't see how
>> we can easily address the underlying problem can you try the following
>> which simply makes this typechecking weaker?
>
> That seems to work.
>
> FYI test results show 98% pass rate for C++ and 98.6% pass rate for C,
> so I'm not sure what the "underlying problem" is, other than
> inappropriate assumptions about what backends do.
>
> To recap: the m32c/80 family of chips does not have an integer type
> which is the same size as pointer types, and which has sufficient math
> support in the chip to satisfy gcc's assumption of riscness.  Thus,
> sizeof(size_t) < sizeof(void *) (16 < 24).  Yes, it really does have
> 24 bit address registers.

Ok, I'll take care of properly comitting the patch.

Richard.