gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question

[Joel Sherrill]

David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>>> Joel Sherrill writes:
>>>>>>             
>
> Joel> Those all look like checks to see if the compiler itself
> Joel> supports Altivec -- not a run-time check on the hardware
> Joel> like the Neon check_effective_target_arm_neon_hw appears
> Joel> to be.
>
>         Look at check_vmx_hw_available again.
>   
Whoops.  That one does indeed check it.  And the RTEMS
target has an ugly exception.  The next set of failures below
that point are not altivec related.   I see a block of failures
like this:

FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution: file bprob-1.gcda does not 
exist,  -fprofile-arcs

And this:

FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/405-mullhw-1.c scan-assembler mullhw

Are those things which would be expected to fail on a vanilla
603e target without networking or disk?

Is this another category of tests to avoid somehow?

-joel
> David
>
>   


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985