[tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS
Zdenek Dvorak
rakdver@kam.mff.cuni.cz
Sun Mar 9 15:42:00 GMT 2008
Hi,
> So, what about adding a GIMPLE_COPY code? The code would have 0
> operands and used only for its numeric value.
another possibility would be to make GIMPLE_COPY an unary operator, and
get rid of the SINGLE_RHS case altogether (of course, unlike any other
unary operator, it would not require its operand to be gimple_val, so
special handling might still be necessary at some places. but it might
be less cumbersome),
Zdenek
More information about the Gcc
mailing list