Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:31 PM, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> wrote: >> Perhaps anything declared volatile should have these semantics. >> Although mentioning 'volatile' on the lkml is probably not a good idea. > > Certainly not. volatile has nothing to do with atomic access. > It was more of an idle thought than a proposal. David Daney