Failure building GFortran (Cygwin)

Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle@verizon.net
Sun Jun 29 17:46:00 GMT 2008


Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> CC'ed to Eric.  This may require some configury patches somewhere.
> 
> Ian
> 
> Angelo Graziosi <angelo.graziosi@alice.it> writes:
> 
>> The point isn't that to find workarounds.
>>
>> The point is, so as stand the things, unless a new Cygwin 1.5.25-16
>> (or 1.5.26-1 ?), the build of GFortran-trunk and friends is
>> *officially* broken for cygwin-users.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Angelo.
>>
>>
>> Dave Korn ha scritto:
>>> Angelo Graziosi wrote on 29 June 2008 11:38:
>>>
>>>> Oops, I have discovered this, in libiberty/ChangeLog
>>>>
>>>> 2008-06-19  Eric Blake  <xxx@xxxx>
>>>>
>>>> 	Adjust strsignal to POSIX 200x prototype.
>>>> 	* strsignal.c (strsignal): Remove const.
>>>   You may need to build and install cygwin from CVS[*] to get the
>>> corresponding newlib fix and install it into your system headers in
>>> /usr/include.  Or you could patch your /usr/include/string.h locally.  See
>>>
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2008/msg00342.html
>>>
>>> for the other half of Eric's patch.
>>>
>>>     cheers,
>>>       DaveK
>>>
>>> [*] - You may not want to do that because of the 1.5 -> 1.7 WIP, in which
>>> case you could rebuild your current DLL from its source package and backport
>>> the patch linked above.
> 
A PR should be opened for this. Has that been done?  Is it marked as a 
regression and as a blocker?

Who has responsibility to fix this?

Regards,

Jerry



More information about the Gcc mailing list