Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?

Tom Tromey tromey@redhat.com
Fri Jun 20 04:24:00 GMT 2008


>>>>> "Florian" == Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:

>> We could look into this.  The minimum subset is probably several
>> hundred classes.  For instance, Class refers to URL, which will
>> probably pull in most of java.net.

Florian> Can't you fallback to the interpreter for the URL class?

We prefer to build most of the core without -findirect-dispatch,
because it yields better performance.  This means that all the direct
dependencies must be compiled and linked in.

Of course we could try to change this.  But, then we'd need a special
mode for this kind of build (I think) and we wouldn't really be
testing things the same way that users build them.

Tom



More information about the Gcc mailing list