Internal abort call optimization?
Richard Guenther
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Tue Jun 17 16:03:00 GMT 2008
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> However, the problem is obviously not restricted to Emacs. If the
>> "noreturn" attribute for the internal abort were removed, at least only
>> abort calls with compatible stack frame and the same (tentative)
>> followup code would get folded. That would avoid the worst
>> head-scratchers when trying to figure out what went wrong.
>
> Without noreturn gcc wouldn't know there is no return needed after
> the abort(). Disabling cross jumping would be probably better.
> I know of a couple of more cases where such an attribute would
> be useful.
You can also build with -fno-builtin-abort.
Richard.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list