Help requested on C++ template syntax (for Emacs development).
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Wed Jun 11 18:15:00 GMT 2008
>>>>> "Alan" == Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
Alan> So, the question: is it possible to identify with 100% certainty, PURELY
Alan> SYNTACTICALLY (i.e. without access to the compiler's symbol table),
Alan> when "< ... >" is a pair of template (C++) or generic (Java) brackets?
In Java, yes, if the source is error-free.
Alan> I'm thinking of things like
Alan> foo (a < b, c > d);
Alan> I think this is unambiguously a function call with 2 parameters, the
Alan> expressions "a < b" and "c > d".
In Java this is a function call. If 'a' is a type, this is an error,
since you can't declare 'd' here.
So... if cc-mode assumes that the code it is looking at is
syntactically correct, you can always guess. But, it is a lot nicer
for the user if errors are flagged. That way lies the Eclipse
approach :-)
Alan> Another related question: although there is no maximum bound on how far
Alan> apart template/generic brackets can be, I believe that in practice, they
Alan> are never that far apart (a few hundred bytes max, perhaps). Is this, in
Alan> fact, the case?
For Java, yeah, generally speaking. There may be exceptions. And
sometimes I think you may find surprising amounts of whitespace in
there.
For C++, I think you are just doomed. Even if you could get the
compiler to emit perfect information, it would only emit information
about the code it actually saw -- not stuff in ignored #if groups.
Tom
More information about the Gcc
mailing list